
According to Fashionlines, the designer Bora Aksu overdid the crochet in his Spring 2006 runway collection, a concept difficult for me to fathom, since I can never get enough of crochet. Their explanation fascinates more than explains: "Aksu's excessive use crochet and dantele [sp? dentelle?] throughout the collection ended up looking like the gifted designer was out to create fashion accessories as opposed to complete ensembles."
I guess this makes sense if you think crochet is only a form of embellishment, not also a method for creating fabric. It is possible for crochet to look heavy-handed as a "complete ensemble"--but not a certainty.
It's interesting to me how the noncrocheting fashion media interpret crochet. For example, this is from London Fashion Week's summation of Aksu's style: "Texture rather than ornate decoration is his thing; so you get fluid layers of bias-cut silk, chiffon and heavy cottons accented with leather or crocheted knit or lace" (emphasis mine).
No complaint here, I'm just chewing on that phrase a bit: so there's crocheted knit (i.e. when you create fabric, like knitting usually does whether by hand or machine?) and there's crocheted lace (i.e. where you use crochet as embellishment, which tends to be crocheted more often than knitted?). Probably just fashion-world-speak where there's wovens vs. 'knits', and embellishing techniques, and Aksu's use of crochet is falling in 2 of these categories that have different meanings in my own Crochetopia.

